B-29 42-6242 in flight November 1943

B-29 42-6242 in flight November 1943

B-29 42-6242 in flight November 1943

A Troubled Superfortress: The B-29 Program’s Challenges in 1943

The B-29 Superfortress program faced significant difficulties in 1943. A confluence of factors contributed to this situation, including technical challenges, production pressures, and programmatic shortcomings.

Technical Issues Plague the B-29

  • Engine Woes: The Wright R-3350-23 Cyclone 18 engine, central to the B-29’s performance, was plagued with problems from the outset. Chronic engine overheating, malfunctions, and even fires led to numerous crashes, aborted takeoffs, and forced landings. These issues would continue to dog the B-29 program throughout the war, with more Superfortresses lost to mechanical failure than to enemy action.
  • Design Complexity and Production Shortcuts: The B-29’s advanced design, while ambitious, also contributed to its early struggles. Features like pressurization, remote-controlled turrets, and sophisticated fire-control systems were groundbreaking but required extensive development and refinement. The rush to get the B-29 into service led to production shortcuts and the use of immature technologies, further exacerbating technical challenges.

Production Pressures and Programmatic Shortcomings

  • Premature Production: The US Army Air Corps, eager to deploy the B-29 against Japan, made the unprecedented decision to order the aircraft into production before the first prototype had even flown. This decision, while driven by the urgency of the war, created a logistical nightmare and contributed to the program’s early woes. Modifications and updates were constantly required, leading to delays, disruptions, and a shortage of flyable aircraft.
  • The “Battle of Kansas”: The effort to modify and update B-29s as they rolled off the production lines proved chaotic and inefficient. Material shortages, skilled labor constraints, and coordination challenges between Boeing and the modification centers created a bottleneck in the program. General Arnold’s visit to Salina in March 1944 to witness the B-29s’ departure for India exposed the program’s dire state – not a single aircraft was ready to leave.

Impact on Training and Operational Readiness

  • Inadequate Training: The scarcity of flyable B-29s in 1943 severely hampered aircrew training. With only 16 out of 97 B-29s airworthy by mid-January, pilots were forced to train on older aircraft like the B-17 and B-26, ill-suited for preparing them for the complexities of the Superfortress.
  • Operational Delays: By the end of 1943, the B-29 program was significantly behind schedule. The goal of deploying B-29s to India by the end of the year to begin bombing operations against Japan had not been met. The first combat mission wouldn’t take place until June 1944.

In summary, the B-29 program in 1943 was characterized by:

  • Persistent engine troubles
  • Immature technologies
  • Production bottlenecks
  • Inadequate training
  • Significant delays in achieving operational readiness

These factors combined to create a program in disarray, struggling to overcome technical and programmatic hurdles while under immense pressure to deliver a war-winning weapon.


Published at 1100 × 858 px.
Link to full-size photo:
B-29 42-6242 in flight November 1943

Site statistics:
Photos of World War II: over 26800
aircraft: 63 models
tanks: 59 models
vehicles: 59 models
guns: 3 models
units: 2
ships: 47
WW2 battlefields - 12
weapon models: -
equipment: -