B-24L Liberator #21 44-49647 and B-17G 44-6643 of the 2nd BG 96th BS over Linz Austria 724th Bomb Squadron 451st Bomb Group

B-24L Liberator #21 44-49647 and B-17G 44-6643 of the 2nd BG 96th BS over Linz Austria 724th Bomb Squadron 451st Bomb Group

B-24L “Flying Ass” of 724th Bomb Squadron, 451st Bomb Group over Linz Austria

Distinguishing the B-24 Liberator from the B-17 Flying Fortress

While both the B-24 Liberator and the B-17 Flying Fortress served as crucial heavy bombers for the US Army Air Force in World War II, several key differences set them apart.

Range and Payload

The B-24 possessed a longer range and a higher bomb-carrying capacity than the B-17. The B-17’s limited range made it unsuitable for missions like the low-level raid on the Ploesti oilfields in Romania, a task the B-24s were able to perform.

Flight Characteristics and Formation Flying

The B-24 had a higher wing loading than the B-17, making it more challenging to handle, particularly in formations at high altitudes. Pilots found it more difficult to maintain formation with B-24s, especially compared to the B-17, which was known for its ruggedness and stability. This difference in handling characteristics often resulted in B-24s being positioned at the rear of B-17 formations, where they were more susceptible to enemy attacks.

Defensive Armament

Both bomber types underwent modifications throughout the war to improve their defensive capabilities. The B-24D, for example, initially carried seven .50-caliber machine guns, but this was eventually increased to ten .50-caliber guns distributed across nose, top, belly, and tail turrets, as well as waist positions. The B-24H and B-24J models featured improved waist gunner positions and standardized on the R-1830-65 engine.

The B-17 also saw improvements in armament, with the later models like the B-17F and B-17G featuring heavier defensive armament and a chin turret for improved forward firepower.

Nose Configuration

The B-24’s “greenhouse” nose, initially designed for better visibility, proved to be a vulnerability against head-on fighter attacks. This weakness led to the development of nose turrets, starting with the B-24G model, to bolster the aircraft’s forward defenses. In contrast, the B-17’s streamlined nose provided better protection for the crew and superior visibility for the bombardier throughout its development.

Production and Versatility

More B-24s were produced than any other American aircraft during World War II, highlighting its adaptability for various roles. This production capacity stemmed from the establishment of multiple manufacturing plants across the United States. The B-24 served in diverse roles, including as a bomber, transport, maritime patrol aircraft (US Navy’s PB4Y Privateer), and in special operations like the Carpetbagger project.

Nose Wheel Assembly

The B-24’s tricycle nose wheel assembly, though innovative, was notoriously weak and proved unsuitable for operations from grass airfields. This weakness limited its operational flexibility compared to the tail-dragging B-17, which was better suited for rougher terrain.


Published at 634 × 512 px.
Link to full-size photo:
B-24L Liberator #21 44-49647 and B-17G 44-6643 of the 2nd BG 96th BS over Linz Austria 724th Bomb Squadron 451st Bomb Group

Site statistics:
Photos of World War II: over 26800
aircraft: 63 models
tanks: 59 models
vehicles: 59 models
guns: 3 models
units: 2
ships: 47
WW2 battlefields - 12
weapon models: -
equipment: -